Friday, January 21, 2005

Of Benny Hinn, and Faith Healers...

Even as I write this, Bangalore is coming to terms with the various facets that are linked to Benny Hinn's "Pray for India" rally being held for three days (starting today) at the Jakkur Airfield Grounds here.

There is enough and more tension brewing up in all parts of the City, what with many a Hindu religious and social outfits taking up opposition of this event. Again, today being Id for the Muslim brethren, has only added to the tension.

Legally speaking, the event per se is not illegal, as religious missionaries have the freedom to propagate their religion, as far as it does NOT infringe on the Indian citizens' Fundamental Rights related to Freedom of Religion (Articles 25 to 28).

Again, the Indian citizens under Article 25 (Freedom of conscience and free profession, practice and propagation of religion) and Article 28 (Freedom as to attendance at religious instruction or religious worship in certain education institutions), have a right to attend, or not attend, or even choose their faith.

So while many of our social, political, and religious leaders are quick to point out that any disturbance caused to the event would be against the law of the secular land of India, I am (for once) NOT in agreement with this.

The reason: This tour is NOT really called "Pray for India" as the hoardings scream out. In fact, on his television programs (on GOD, and other channels), this is called "The India Crusade," and he blatantly says that the idea is to convert as many as possible (in his words the people of India!) to the "only way to God".

While respecting his religious sentiments (everybody has a right to their own faith!), I have to say that the proponents, custodians, and followers of Hindu, and other religions, ALSO have every right to OPPOSE the Benny Hinn event, simply because during a recent visit to Trinidad and Tobago, Benny Hinn stated that he had converted mostly Hindus there, who made up 30 percent of the population, during his "crusade".

So there is indeed every cause for concern on their part, and in that way their actions are in fact in "Public Good"; Especially in the interest of the religious harmony that has hitherto existed here.

In the same vein, I also admire and express my support to all those journalists who were part of the Press Meet at the Bangalore Press Club on January 15, 2005, where they opposed the distribution of printed literature that was blatant insulting Hindu and other 'pagan' religions, to say the least.

Kudos to you, journalists of Bangalore.

Also, three cheers to the learned Judge of the Bangalore High Court, Shri Belvadi Ramaswamy, who has ordered that the event be monitored through close-circuit cameras, and that 15 (medically examined) "handicapped people" be monitored for miracles by a team of 5 doctors.

I salute the High Court of Karnataka!

In fact, I go on record to state that I SUPPORT ALL those that are opposing the Benny Hinn's show here and anywhere else in the world.

The reasons are NOT really linked to religion, NOR are they linked to conversion. They are entirely linked to various facts that point to Benny Hinn being a con artist, and NOTHING MORE than an unscrupulous charlatan, who is feeding on the emotions of the bereaved and needy, in the name of God and religion, all for his own financial benefits.

Most of his prophesies have been wrong, while others are fast running out of the time they require to be right.

Again, Justin Peters (a staff evangelist at the First Baptist Church in Vicksburg, Mississippi) who analyzed Benny Hinn's Ministry and it's methods for his master's thesis in theology, concludes that, "Benny Hinn is a false prophet in every sense of the word. He is a pathological liar seemingly incapable of telling the truth even about major events in his own life history."

In fact, Benny Hinn the Faith Healer is, in the name of God and Religion, giving false hope, (mis)using the secrets of conjuring and hypnotism, and duping millions of their hard-earned pennies, and stacking away zillions.

To me the best words to expose Hinn are those by James Randi (magician, and author of the book The Faith Healers), as quoted in the article Controversial evangelist to visit Waco:
James Randi, a professional magician/escape artist who is perhaps best known these days as a "demystifier of paranormal and pseudoscientific claims," recalled in a recent telephone interview how he disguised himself to attend a Benny Hinn faith healing service on behalf of the BBC in Toronto. With a hidden camera, he said, he captured on film some of the assisting pastors coaching people when to fall down, as well as scenes of paramedics coming to the aid of those supposedly "cured" who collapsed when their adrenaline rush subsided after their on-stage "cure."

"We have followed up on 104 of his so-called cures, and not a one of those people was healed. There is no medical evidence to support his claims," Randi said.

It doesn't matter how many times the secular media or skeptical investigators expose Hinn's actions, he added. "There are people who need for it to be true. They are predicating everything on their belief that faith healing works. For some people, it's the only thing they've got going."


Thus, Hinn should be stopped. In every possible way.

Nakul

Tuesday, January 04, 2005

Derren Brown as a Messiah!

Derren to play Messiah

By SIMON ROTHSTEIN

TELLY trickster Derren Brown is trying to convince American religious leaders that he is the Messiah.

The controversial illusionist is putting his powers to the test for a new series to be broadcast on Channel 4 next year.

In the show, called Messiah, Derren looks at a variety of religious and spiritual beliefs. [more ...]

Reproduced from the Sun Magazine Online - Bizzarre Online.

- - - - -

Interesting that!

I for one would be more than keen to know how people react to this act by Derren Brown.

Is this going to expose the delusions of these new age movements, or is it only going to contribute to Derren's publicity needs...? This is a question that I would love answered.

Again, as Derren is a mentalist and psychic entertainer, his stating that "I allow them to decide how much they are going to endorse it and embrace it. If at any point they ask me if this is some sort of trick, I will confess and tell them," to me gathers more importance.

He will admit that what he does is a "trick" and not so much aspects of non-verbal communication, et al? Does that not undermine the effect as presented in mentalism?

Again, is this ONLY because what he would be demonstrating are effects used by the new age gurus and other "psychics" and not so much by mentalists and psychic entertainers... especially
Derren Brown himself?

Nakul

Monday, January 03, 2005

Of gaining publicity... and social responsibility

Magician predicted terrible earthquake

December 29, 2004 11:58

NORWICH magician Geraldini claimed last night he had predicted a national disaster — days before the tsunami terror hit south-east Asia, killing tens of thousands of people.

More than one week ago he said he could forecast the headlines on the front page of the Evening News on Tuesday December 28.

He wrote down his predictions — he was the only one to see them — and put them in a box on Graham Barnard's breakfast show on Radio Norfolk.

The box was then padlocked and kept by the presenter until last night, when it was taken along to the opening night of A Cavalcade of Mystery, Magic and Illusion at St Peter's Theatre, Park Lane, Norwich.

Before the start of the show Geraldini — real name Gerald Morter — invited Graham Barnard and Derek James of the Evening News on to the stage.

He then asked Graham to open the box. Inside was another box containing a small brown envelope.

The magician handed over the envelope, saying it was the one he put in the box on Monday, December 20, to the radio presenter who then read out what was written on it.

It said: "I, Geraldini, predict that the front page of the Evening News dated Tuesday, December 28 December, 2004 will reveal the worst under-sea earthquake to hit Thailand and Asia. This quake will cause great damage and loss of life."

The front page of the Evening News told the tragic story of how a Norfolk mother-of-four was swept to her death as the immense wave hit her in Thailand.

When asked how he had done it he said: "I can't say. I am sorry it is such a sad and tragic story."


From Evening News 24, UK

------------

Magicians have to owe moral responsibility for actions that they carry out. A prediction of this nature defeats the very purpose of staging a "prediction act".

The one question that will find a place in every reader's mind is: Why divulge a prediction of such a disaster, AFTER the event has taken place?

In simple words, because it is a magic effect, and NOT a psychical (sic) prediction.

This kind of a prediction fails logic, and thus loses ALL magical properties. Worse, it can be seem as being sick, and sadistic.

A similar unfortunate incident happened to a friend of mine here in India, a couple of years back. He was doing a prediction for the local newspapers. And bang! One of the worst train accidents occurred... And he ended up "predicting" the same.

Sadly, a good performer had to avoid the public eye for quite a long while, as there were many a people who questioned his social responsibility...

Does that mean magicians have to avoid utilizing this otherwise excellent publicity stunt? For like in the case of these magicians, you NEVER know when disaster is going to strike... (unless you are a 'real' psychic!) and thus strike a blow to one's entertainment career too.

IMHO, No. We can still go ahead and use this excellent publicity gimmick. Only that in the event of such calamities, we HAVE TO AVOID including that as the prediction. "Predict" some other headline... not the bad one. Stick with some good news....

At least that way you have an "out" that this was the only one you saw... And did not "foresee" the other (calamity). That way, at least you will NOT have lynch mobs looking for you...

Just a thought. And I may be wrong.

Nakul